http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
--- Comment #16 from NicolasChauvet <[email protected]> 2009-03-18 11:28:30 --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > @Lubos > > - Why do you think anything got stripped once debuginfo subpackage are > > disabled? > > See /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note. Indeed, I see this as a bug in redhat-rpm-config. > I sent you my .spec file for a reference. Maybe it is sitting in your spam > folder. Please attach your spec per this review... I haven't received anything. > > - Where to get the sfx modules ? Where to store them ? > > I am packaging sfxs into %{_libdir} and symlinking them into /usr/local/etc again, I don't know where to download the sfx files. > Some packages are compressed by rar. It would be possible to extract them by > rar_static in the build time (it would limit the build to work only on %{ix86} > and x86_64). It will be better to repackage the sources if such case appears > Maybe it would be useful to package modules in a standalone package (rar-sfx) > to speed up the review of the main rar package. Possible as this rar-sfx may be a noarch package, but only useful on ix86 x86_64. unless I'm wrong. btw is it relevant to have the linux-x86_64.sfx on x86 ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
