http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680
--- Comment #5 from Eric Moret <[email protected]> 2009-06-25 01:21:51 --- > the maemo plateform target an arm processor. This plugin is only usefull to > control the dsp on such plateform. There is no dependency expect from dbus. [snip] > There is a maemo sub-package that can be found for some distro on ix86 and > x86_64. But I expect it will be usefull only for development purpose. (And I'm > not even sure). Why would we want a package specific to the maemo platform knowing that the distro itself does not officialy support the platform? If you think I missed it, could you point me to the Fedora maemo support page? > The current shape, only the a52 and lavcrate plugin are provided (in other > word, only needs the libavcodec dependency since a52 from libavcodec extends > feature wise the previous a52dec implementation.) > I would like to keep the freeworld keyword, and stay monolithic unless other > dependencies are added... I am not suggesting the freeworld keyword should go but rather that using subpackages would be consistent with other alsa-plugins subpackages. Splitting the package has the additional benefit of not bloating the streamlined setup of an embedded device. I would prefer to see 2 packages, one containing the a52 plugin: alsa-plugins-freeworld-a52 and the other having the lavcrate: alsa-plugins-freeworld-lavcrate even if they both depend on libavcodec. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
