http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680
--- Comment #8 from NicolasChauvet <[email protected]> 2009-06-29 14:15:09 --- (In reply to comment #7) > > > [snip] I would prefer to see 2 packages, one containing the a52 > > > plugin: alsa-plugins-freeworld-a52 and the other having the lavcrate: > > > alsa-plugins-freeworld-lavcrate even if they both depend on libavcodec. > > OK I will follow this method. Am I allowed to keep the > > alsa-plugins-freeworld > > as an empty package that will pick -a52 and -lavcrate ? > > If you simply re-use the alsa-plugins subpackage structure you should end up > with a source package called alsa-plugins-freeworld and upon building, two > binary packages alsa-plugins-freeworld-a52 and > alsa-plugins-freeworld-lavcrate. Ok I will implement that. What about speex plugin addition from Fedora side ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
