http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #29 from Alex Lancaster <[email protected]> 2010-01-17 08:07:48 --- (In reply to comment #19) > When reporting a bug upstream they tend to insist on copies of these logs, so > maybe worth keeping it in there? I'll leave this in for the moment anyway. > I noticed upstream have been working on porting python 2.6.4 to xbmc. Is > anyone > working with them to ensure that the external Fedora python will work? > Currently if you build with external python (as required by Fedora) then > python > based plugins (i.e. most plugins) fail to work. It would seem to be a good > time > to encourage upstream to ensure xbmc will work with Fedora python as the > plugins are heavily used. I think other distro packagers (Debian etc.) have been leaning on upstream XBMC to fix this, but I don't think it's a high priority for the devs when I've discussed this on IRC. Some don't see the point in distro packages and recommend "XBMC Live", others just don't have time to work on fixing the Python bugs. Obviously I'm sure they'd be happy to take patches that fix this, however I don't have the time to work on the innards of the python-xbmc bindings myself. Was there an upstream trac bug that's dedicated to fixing this, or a forum post that outlines this porting effort that you know about? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
