http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #36 from [email protected] 2010-01-20 17:15:47 --- (In reply to comment #21) > %configure --enable-external-libraries --enable-goom SVN_REV="24886" > > (For example for release 9.11) I don't understand this. AFAICT, 9.11 is svn revision 26017 on xbmc.org's 9.11_Camelot branch (https://xbmc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xbmc/branches/9.11_Camelot) (In reply to comment #28) > > * /usr/bin/xbmc contains some magic to produce "verbose core dump logs". > > I am not sure, this logic is useful in general and on Fedora in particular > > (abrt already takes care about it), but I don't have a strong opinion on it. > > Does abrt work with filing bugs on bugzillas for with 3rd party repos like RPM > Fusion? Well, I've seen abrt popping up when xbmc went down. Whether this is usable/useful is a different question. Anyway, so far, I've never experienced abrt doing anything useful anywhere - not even with original Fedora bugzilla.redhat.com hosted Fedora packages. If you really want to keep the wrapper, then * you'd have to introduce at least "Require: gdb" (A silly idea, IMO) and a "Requires: redhat-lsb" (Pulls in a long series of dependencies) or to check for presence of them at runtime. * fix the script into a location which is more likely to be writeable (e.g. $(HOME)) than $(pwd) Finally, I just noticed that xbmc.sh still accesses /usr/share/xbmc/xbmc.bin. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
