http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #42 from Alex Lancaster <[email protected]> 2010-01-21 09:02:11 --- OK, time to do a quick patch audit, Rolf and Ralf, could you clarify the following points? Thanks. Rolf: is this necessary, it seems to add a single "-I ../jpeg", I thought that xbmc is using the system libjpeg at this point, should it be submitted upstream? Patch0: xbmc-9.11-a2-libjpeg.patch Rolf: has this been submitted upstream, will this be fixed in the 10.x release? Patch1: xbmc-9.11-a2-gcc440.patch This patch look for libdca, rather than libdts, there is already: http://xbmc.org/trac/ticket/8040 (although patch slightly different to this one) Patch2: xbmc-9.11-b1-config.patch Rolf, is this necessary if we remove dvdcss from source? Patch3: xbmc-9.11-b1-dvdlibs-external.patch This had been submitted upstream: http://xbmc.org/trac/ticket/8026 (should be in next release): Patch4: xbmc-9.11-use_cdio_system_headers_on_non_win32.patch I added next 3 patches to trac: http://xbmc.org/trac/ticket/8590 Patch5: xbmc-9.11-fix-Makefile.in.patch Patch6: xbmc-9.11-Makefile.include.in.diff Patch7: xbmc-9.11-xbmc.sh.diff Rolf: could you clarify the purposes of the next 3 patches be submitted upstream? Remlibs appears to force using external libass: Patch8: xbmc-9.11-spyce.diff Patch9: xbmc-9.11-RandomNumberGenerators.hpp.diff Patch10: xbmc-9.11-remlibs.patch Ralf this fixes GCC warning: partial backport to 9.11, will this be fixed in next release? Do we need to report upstream? Patch11: xbmc-9.11-changeset-26191.diff This fixes problems with web server segfaulting on x86_64, I submitted http://xbmc.org/trac/ticket/8591 Patch12: xbmc-9.11-GoAhead.diff -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
