http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122
--- Comment #1 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-03-19 17:53:39 --- Some comments: 1. %global baseversion 0137 #global sourceupdate 4 %if 0%{?sourceupdate} Version: %{baseversion}u%{sourceupdate} %else Version: %{baseversion} %endif Release: 1%{?dist} #global sourceupdate 4 -> #global sourceupdate u4 Version: 0.%{baseversion} Release: 1.{?sourceupdate}%{?dist} Note:{?sourceupdate} should be added in release section as fedora naming guideline, such as 0.137-2.u1.fc13 3. %ifarch x86_64 ppc64-> %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 sparc64 s390 Also you can not define suffix64 in specfile by using wildcard instead. install -pm 755 %{name}%{?suffix64}d %{buildroot}%{_bindir} ->install -pm 755 %{name}*d %{buildroot}%{_bindir} install -pm 755 chdman jedutil ldplayer%{?suffix64} ldresample ldverify \-> install -pm 755 chdman jedutil ldplayer* ldresample ldverify \ 4. Source0-> http://www.aarongiles.com/mirror/releases/%{name}0137s.exe 5. Patch0 not used in specfile 6. Provides: sdlmame = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: sdlmame < 0136-2 -> Provides: sdlmame = %{baseversion}-%{release} Obsoletes: sdlmame < 0137-1 7. duplicate file found in subpackage. %doc docs/license.txt %doc docs/license.txt You should not rely all on rpmlint output. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
