http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122
--- Comment #3 from Julian Sikorski <[email protected]> 2010-03-19 20:55:47 --- 1. I believe that the whole dance with splitting version between %version and %release is to ensure proper upgrade paths. I checked that it works, 0137u10 > 0137u1 < 0137. And putting the "u" into the %global will break the algorithm which applies the patches sequentially to the "u" releases. I know it was this way in SDLMAME, but RB released it as full zips. I never liked the versions like 0.137-0.1.0136u1 anyway. 2. I can't see it ;) 3. I could, but I can't do it for the main binary name, which would lead to inconsistent use of macros. I can add other architectures, sure. 4. That's just one of the mirrors, I guess I could hardcode it as we do for sourceforge/nongnu/whatever. 5. Valid point. This is a leftover from testing a bug. I'll fix that. 6. Obsoletes is OK, point 1 for Provides. 7. I can kill the duplicate docs, no problem. The ini file was put into the subdir so that cab builders could place config files in there without polluting /etc/. ui.bdc was generated from ui.bdf, which was shipped with sdlmame zip. Aaron said it might return someday, so I left it in. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
