http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=993
--- Comment #27 from Chen Lei <[email protected]> 2010-06-24 21:17:55 --- (In reply to comment #26) > I don't see why I should obsolete my "freeze" package. Right now, I even don't > see any replacement inside of Fedora. > And even if "zeroc-ice" is a replacement for "freeze", I'm even unable to see > this package in Fedora: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/list/?searchwords=zeroc%2A Right, zeroc-ice is not a replacement for the freeze in Fedora. You don't need to retire it. > May you provide much more information, please? Because "freeze" has users on > EL-4+ and F-12+ - in Fedora and EPEL. I don't see how RPM Fusion would cover > this, because RPM Fusion is less wide used than EPEL. No one except you will agree freeze have more users than mlt, in fact it's dead in upstream for more than 10 years and don't include in all linux distributions except fedora. Bugzilla showes low activities on this package. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=freeze&product=Fedora mlt is offcial supported by debian, ubuntu, gentoo, arch and melt is also requires by other package(e.g. openshot), thus rename to melt in freeze to some other name will be more easier. Also, fedora don't encourage packagers maintaining packages without any upstream support. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
