http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740
--- Comment #18 from Göran Uddeborg <[email protected]> 2010-12-06 18:53:24 --- > > 1. meka.i686: W: invalid-license Distributable > > Fedora doesn't accept "Distributable" as a license any more. > The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the *binary* RPM: True. The unused parts of the source package should not be included in the license field. But as I have understood it, one problem with "distributable" is that it is too vague. Maybe I have read in more than there is. But for me a license description like "Meka and non-commercial" or "BSD-like and non-commercial" would give me much more information than simply "distributable". > I had to hardcode > i686 otherwise plague on RPM Fusion will build packages for i386, i486, i585 > and i686 if you use the %ix86 macro. Aha! Yes, that would not be such a good idea! > Anyway, I won't use your translations because I won't be able to maintain > them. A package (RPM package or original upstreams source package) can't have too many translations if the package maintainer is to maintain them himself! :-) But you do as you wish! > Anyway this script is just slightly adapted form the > Games SIG Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging > > Therefore I think all game wrappers in Fedora have this issue. Yes, it seems to be so. > Upstream has responded: > http://www.smspower.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=63839#63839 > > It seems to be an allegro bug. Ok. I'll put on my to-do-list to make a test case based on the code snippet in the reply, and send to the allegro team. I would like to hear your view on my comments on the license text, otherwise I'm happy with this version. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
