http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740
--- Comment #21 from Andrea Musuruane <[email protected]> 2010-12-11 14:27:59 --- (In reply to comment #20) > I am trying to CONVINCE you, but I won't ENFORCE my view. Especially since > the > rules for the license part is slightly fuzzy, since it is one area where > RPMfusion differs from Fedora. If you add "and non-commercial" to the > license, > I will accept this package, even though I personally think "Meka" or > "BSD-like" > would be better than "distributable". I followed your advice and changed the tag to "MEKA and non-commercial". Updates: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/meka.spec http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/meka-0.73-4.fc14.src.rpm Changelog: - Fixed license -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
