FYI, an official 275.09.07 is released. On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So what I plan to do instead is to import the driver in rawhide and > > request users affected by this bug to use akmod-nvidia from rawhide. > > The other plan is to maintain another branch of the driver as > > nvidia-latest or nvidia-beta (which branch already exists). to provide > > another parallele driver. > > Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation until today. > > I have built some -beta packages successfully but have some > questions/observations: > > 1. I added a "Conflict:" for the non-beta package in the beta package. > I assume we'd need to do the opposite for the non-beta package? > 2. There are a few places where the spec file differ significantly > from the template[1]. Specifically in the "buildforkernels" macros. I > as able to follow the wiki and get a new akmod package built but > there's a small typo on the wiki as well. In the macro definition it > should be "akmod" not "akmods" as that isn't a valid kmodtool option. > 3. On a related note, the --newest, --current, & --akmod options are > not shown in "kmodtool --help". Is this intentional? > > Thanks, > Richard > > [1] http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2
-- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments