https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2098
--- Comment #25 from Jeremy Newton <[email protected]> 2012-02-21 21:38:00 CET --- (In reply to comment #24) > Same goes for fedorapeople.org IIRC. Yeah fedorapeople.org has the same rules as the fedora repos. (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > > But as Julian said, use koji to build Fedora packages not RPMFusion > > > packages, > > > as RPMFusion packages tend to depend on things that aren't a part of > > > Fedora. > > > > That, and in extreme cases it might put Fedora at legal risk since the > > questionable content is being hosted on their servers. > > I got the message... It was a mistake, probably caused by inexperience > combined > with switching between RH and RPMFusion too rapidly, too many things in the > air. I am sorry, really. Haha, it's alright, it's quite alright, no harm done and nothing that couldn't have been fixed anyway. :) (In reply to comment #21) >Git is no problem at all. But you need to show to complete sequence of commands >leading up to the tarball. Fair enough, that makes sense; I'll include that in my next rev. I'll just use second source, as that probably makes the most amount of sense. >Talking to upstream is of course never wrong. In the meantime, can't you just >remove these and replace with symlinks to system headers in %prep? Yeah I was going to try that first but I'm not sure if that will work to be honest. I think it may mess up the debug package but that is a bit of a blind guess lol. None the less, I'm going to report it upstream in hopes it gets fixed in the next stable version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
