On Qua, 2013-05-01 at 09:14 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/29/2013 03:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > 2013/4/29 Hans de Goede <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > ... > > sidplay-2.0.9-13.fc17.x86_64 > > > > > > While working on sidplay, I found out there is a new upstream for it > > called sidplayfp, > > which fixes the issues making sidplay nonfree. So I've packaged > > libsidplayfp and > > sidplay for Fedora. Also the sid plugin for audacious has been changed > > to build with > > libsidplayfp and this has now landed in Fedora-updates for F-19+, so > > the following > > packages can now be retired from rpmfusion: > > > > sidplay > > sidplay-libs > > audacious-plugins-nonfree > > > > I'll go and create dead.package files for them in their F-19+ branches. > > What is > > the proper procedure for blocking these from inclusion in rpmfusion > > F-19+ repos ? > > > > > > I will manually remove them from the repository. > > taking care of that before the next push. > > > > BTW, what about an audacity update (in both fedora and RPM Fusion ?) > > It looks unmaintained. > > I've pinged the Fedora maintainer and he admits he was away for a while, but > he is back now. > > I've offered him help on getting the Fedora packages upgraded to 2.0.3, once > that is done > I'll also take care of the rpmfusion packages.
We already have a ticket to fix audacity : https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2707 see you there ;) Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.
