https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2795
--- Comment #5 from Rave <[email protected]> 2013-05-15 20:56:08 CEST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Just some drive-by comments, or really questions: > > > - Does the build process download the proprietary blobs during the build > > No, the proprietary blobs are only needed for runtime after installing. > > We might have a problem here. This looks like the discussion in bug 1992 about > a package which downloads non-free code. Basically, I would say this looks > like > a blocker. If i found a solution about your second hint, i will contact dropbox. > > Does the license conditions permit re-distributing? If so, one could perhaps > download the blob and include it in the rpm?! > > > > - Does the build process require a valid DISPLAY since the specfile sets > > > this? > > Without that building fails, same as in the original srpm > > (nautilus-dropbox). > > https://linux.dropbox.com/fedora/pool/nautilus-dropbox-1.6.0-1.fedora.src.rpm > > Hm. Also problematic since I presume that the builders does not have a display > available(?). I'am giving up. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=5385151&name=build.log&offset=-4000 checking for pygtk... no This is the reason for using 'export DISPLAY=:0.0' Do you now a solution for this? Otherwise i will close the request and do what i ever did for 1 year, providing the package on a external repo. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=276286 :( Wolfgang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
