On 2013-11-18 21:51, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2013-11-18 at 21:36 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-11-18 20:29, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sex, 2013-11-15 at 19:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I wrote:
And if FPC doesn't feel competent, they should say so so we can re-file
the ticket with FESCo (or they could just forward it to FESCo directly).
Actually, I see FPC made a decision now, that's good.
And what was decision ? , I don't understand what is write in the
ticket .
It basically boils down to that the main lpf package is OK for fedora,
while lpf-* packages as lpf-skype and lpf-spotify-client should be in a
'more appropriate repository' (Don't mention the war...)
I have retired lpf-spotify-client from fedora. lpf-skype and
lpf-spotify-client are on their way into rpmfusion in tickets 3033 and
3034 in a joint venture between me and Simone Caronni.
I will join in with "Adobe flash reader", it is possible ?
Many thanks,
You are welcome!. It should be possible as long as the license allows us
to freely download and build a package i. e., there must be no
limitations on the downloader. The target package can have
limitations, I presume it's "non-redistributable, no modications permitted'.
Look at the two tickets for examples, there is also a commented template
in the lpf upstream at github which is reasonably up to date.
Preferably, use the lpf version in updates-testing while testing,
current lpf in main repo has some annoying glitches. Assume you will
find bugs...
If you submit a review request I can review it.
--alec
