https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3356
--- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede <[email protected]> 2014-09-26 14:34:12 CEST --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > ... > > > Now I would have the reason why downloading plugin "feature" was not > > > spitted > > > into another package so this one could be kept into fedora ? > > > > It is an integral part of the upstream functionality. > > Do you mean that the package will not work with FOSS plugins cross-compiled > for > windows if the Adobe Reader and Silverlight plugins download are disabled ? No, using cross compiled FOSS plugins should work in theory if the plugins are installed manually. > I still don't understand why downloading would be disabled in the fedora > package ? SRP is part of gnutls upstream and that doesn't prevent it to be > disable in fedora, that's the same. Or what is the reason ? Fedora gave a very sound and clear, no discussion possible no answer to including pipelight in Fedora: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1331 Since it has clearly been rejected for Fedora I don't understand why we're having this discussion really, if you don't think it is suitable for free, then lts put it in non-free and be done with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
