On Qui, 2014-10-02 at 07:41 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 02.10.2014 o 01:46, Sérgio Basto pisze: > > On Qua, 2014-10-01 at 19:38 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > >> W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:51, Sérgio Basto pisze: > >>> On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > >>>> W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze: > >>>>> On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > >>>>>> W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: > >>>>>>> On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > >>>>>>>> Dear all, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild > >>>>>>>> coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which > >>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>> not bad given the extent of API changes: > >>>>>>>> - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error: 'struct a52_ctx' > >>>>>>>> has > >>>>>>>> no member named 'frame' > >>>>>>>> - dvbcut: lavfmuxer.cpp:63:57: error: 'av_new_stream' was not > >>>>>>>> declared > >>>>>>>> in this scope > >>>>>>>> - kmediafactory: videofile.cpp:74:45: error: 'av_find_stream_info' > >>>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>> not declared in this scope (mencoder needs to be rebuilt first) > >>>>>>>> - vlc: configure: error: libavcodec versions 56 and later are not > >>>>>>>> supported yet. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Given that we are close to branching (?), what would be the good > >>>>>>>> time to > >>>>>>>> do the rebuild? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> yes, I don't see any problem, I can do the mass rebuild of others > >>>>>>> packages, no problem. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> My question if we ever put this updates on F20 ? I'd like put it at > >>>>>>> least on update-testing. I can made a list of the packages, with > >>>>>>> ffmpeg / x264 dependencies, that should stay on update-testing for > >>>>>>> more > >>>>>>> time than usual, but is not my decision . > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> ffmpeg-2.4.1 has now been built. I will take care of rebuilding > >>>>>> mplayer. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>> Julian > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, please wait, let's wait to know if kwizart allow us to put ffmpeg > >>>>> 2.3.3 in F20, we think it is better and we have strong reasons , like > >>>>> explained in > >>>>> https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2014-September/017393.html > >>>>> > >>>>> Kwizart , do you allow this exception ? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>> Just to be clear: I only pushed it to devel. F20 is still an open > >>>> question. > >>> > >>> yes , but I want copy from devel to F20, the state of art , before > >>> upgrading to ffmpeg 2.4 , and it is more easier , clean etc , if just > >>> after this (update ffmpeg to 2.4) . ... > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >> If we ever decide to upgrade f20 (which I don't think we will given the > >> current fiasco), please do not overwrite the f20 spec with f21 one. I > >> suggest comparing the two and upgrading in parallel, something like git > >> cherry-pick. > > > > Hi , Julian , that is the point, this is cvs , we don't have "upgrading > > in parallel", I try rolling devel to branches and yes "overwrite the f20 > > spec" and what is in f20 spec is discard. Is the only rule of > > organization that we have . > > I was not aware we have that rule. Until now, I was maintaining seperate > branches for ffmpeg and mplayer. I still believe that upgrading F-20 > independently is better as it preserves the history better. > > > > > But the main problem was and still is, lack of time , so I and kwizart > > (writing off-list) haven't much time next days and he point to try again > > (the mass rebuild) no this weekend but next weekend, meantime > > ffmpeg-2.3.3 still on devel (I think) . > > > > This is an ancient system so it give much work do all mass rebuild, see > > if we can make a new builder happen. > > > > Kwizart roll back to ffmpeg-2.3 , because though we haven't patches for > > vlc build against ffmpeg2-4 and lack of time of course . > > What was wrong with the vlc patch I linked to?
Kwizart was not aware , at the time , just that . > > > > Please be patient ... > > > Julian -- Sérgio M. B.