https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3554
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA <[email protected]> 2015-03-01 15:28:00 CET --- Program itself seems to be working correctly. * License - Well, please never modify license text downstream, even if rpmlint complains for it. License modification must be done only on upstream. * BuildRequires: - For pkgconfig based BR (i.e. "PKG_CHECK_MODULES" in configure.ac) it is better to use pkgconfig vitual BR, like BuildRequires: pkgconfig(flac) (not a blocker) * License tag - (not a blocker) License tag can simply be GPLv2+ (This is effectively one single binary, and writing multiple licenses where GPLv2+ is predominant actually does not make sense) * License file - Use %license for license text: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text * %defattr - %defattr can be removed (current rpmbuild does not need this any longer) * rpmfusion category - Well, I think this is "free" category for rpmfusion, not "nonfree" > This package needs to link the following nonfree > libraries, so this package is nonfree. My recognition is that they are actually "free" (patent issue or so does not make it "nonfree" category), would you check this? (Also check MOCK.log attached) * incorrect-fsf-address rpmlint - Please ping upsteam later (check rpmlint result for -debuginfo rpm) (not a blocker) Well, please check above. I don't see strict blocker for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
