On Qui, 2015-10-15 at 07:29 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:54:28AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Seg, 2015-10-12 at 08:30 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for > > > Fedora-23: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 > > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 > > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 > > > > > > But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What are the > > > plans here ? > > > > Hi, > > > > Last 3 of October (the day which I proposed the IRC meeting), the user > > glamber asked if the repo rpmfusion 22 had stopped. kwizart replied : > > "I've recently restore one of my builder during the last week > > so I should be able to forward the missing f22-updates. > > Then I will work on f23, but still on day to day tasks, and way too > > little on new infra tasks" > > I deduce f22-updates was stopped, but now it is working again. > > And checking http://download1.rpmfusion.org I also notice the F23 repo > > is published in directory development/23/ ! > > > > I continue propose schedule a meeting on IRC, I do not know if it will > > be productive, but to seed some ideas on how to help and what is highest > > priority. Question in a workday or on weekend ? > > > > About ideas, over the builders and git server, we must have some layers > > like packages [1], Bodhi2 , Pkgdb2, cgit, what do you think is the next > > piece that we should integrated ? > > I don't think packages should have the priority. At least not until it > receives > the work that we are planning on doing on it and while useful for user it does > not have an influence on the other tools (bothi2, pkgdb2).
After thinking, pkgdb2 seems to be the most important, because we can give acls to commit permissions ... Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.
