2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > > On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >> Hello mates >> >> On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >>> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <[email protected]>: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x >>> for Fedora-23: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 >>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 >>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 >>> >>> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What >>> are the >>> plans here ? >>> Sorry for the lake for answear, >>> >>> >>> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time >>> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen. >>> >>> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key, >>> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages >>> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others) >>> >>> >>> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23 >>> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from >>> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!) >>> >>> As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with >> x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd >> like try do it in oneshot ... >> >> Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148 >> yesterday for F23 . >> >> I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had >> publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) , >> I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination >> to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest >> and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump . >> > > Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would > be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for > F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite > its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg. >
We will probably be using the lastest ffmpeg-2.8.1 altought it's not completely well known for the amount of work to make that very recent version fit. Right now x265 and xvidcore are failing. Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)
