2015-10-25 21:12 GMT+01:00 Julian Sikorski <[email protected]>: > W dniu 23.10.2015 o 13:57, Sérgio Basto pisze: > > Hello mates > > > > On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <[email protected]>: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x > >> for Fedora-23: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 > >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 > >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 > >> > >> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What > >> are the > >> plans here ? > >> Sorry for the lake for answear, > >> > >> > >> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time > >> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen. > >> > >> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key, > >> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages > >> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others) > >> > >> > >> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23 > >> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from > >> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!) > >> > > As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with > > x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd > > like try do it in oneshot ... > > > > Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148 > > yesterday for F23 . > > > > I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had > > publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) , > > I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination > > to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest > > and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump . > > > > > > [1] > > http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists > > > > [2] > > > https://github.com/sergiomb2/x264/commit/01df16222127c265ad7781fc9a1e9419e1ee64ee > >> > > > >> > > > I am back now - but it looks like an f23 ffmpeg has been attempted > already. It failed due to missing deps - I am guessing f23 buildroot is > not completely populated yet. > xvidcore and x265 are failing.
-- - Nicolas (kwizart)
