-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 12/28/2015 01:30 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2015-12-27 at 11:51 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 12/27/2015 09:04 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:48:23AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 12/27/2015 01:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, RPMFusion respects Fedora packaging guidelines or
>>>>>> not?
>>>>> 
>>>>> yes we do
>>>> 
>>>> Aparently RPMFusion does not repect the FPG. Packages
>>>> complying to the FPG are supposed to have been rebuilt for
>>>> f23 and therefore to carry a package suffix of ".f23".
>>> 
>>> Not really. There are often mass rebuild during Fedora 
>>> development, caused by various reasons: new GCC, change of
>>> default compiler flags, hardening etc.  But mass rebuild is not
>>> required for every Fedora release.
>>> 
>> 
>> At last someone comprehends what I meant. Beyond .fc suffix (that
>> could create confusion during Fedora upgrade however), here
>> you're saying that RPMFusion packages must not be audited
>> periodically, even for months, it's enough they work.
>> 
>> I ask again, how can we know if a package .fc(x) compiles/works
>> fine on Fedora(x+n) without a rebuild?
> 
> Is the power of RPM , if fulfill all requires of package it works
> (rpm -q --requires package)
> 
> For example Mosaic-2.7-0.3.b5.fc11.x86_64 still works on Fedora 23
> , but is a FTBFS since F12 or 13 . So fail to build is not
> equivalent to fail to run .
> 

Works but surely does not respect anymore all Packaging guidelines of
Fedora.

- -- 
Antonio Trande

mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565E653C
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWgWdxAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8C+EH/3u88qQ6FMAq0VMnyWmTasez
opEEZ/CnK/cKpkBRrOwOjtQiyxsrEIQRNHxTVRoqh37+XkyPNU27n5dNdJyY/1MW
p31LnTCmYPYQ+2eG8vw9CAtK/pyiTILviPmGF9FWYmiLdFbpYzh4+cKFjU5oo5KL
+RDgm3pcEvQjcE2GAC7N/vC+aZOxJndFkNVqYIO8SPBmvLq4y9F07xuXAQVI/Xuu
DV7mfgZR1msdWzskrkL2Ao2tUFS3km9pm9MvXhH5YJvVfczHW0TfVfBfkmlKzpoV
P6UVLvyfhXP4RJq71w8Qn1P6oCDydYR+EbgHF39C5KYFd0qlI5EYGlYfZ2EpOxg=
=DgFz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to