On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 11:02, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, S�rgio Basto wrote: > > On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > >> On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >>> 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande > >>> <anto.tra...@gmail.com <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>>: > >>> > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet on > >>> Fedora 22 and devel branch. Please, require a rebuild > >>> (https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821) as soon > >>> as possible: > >>> > >>> faad2 libmpeg2 libdca twolame > >>> > >>> > >>> All of them are actually available, please double check your > >>> system. > >>> > >>> Nicolas (kwizart) > >>> > >> > >> Hi Nicolas, > >> > >> are available as fc23 packages? > > > > no , they are available as fc22 in F23 > > > > Honestly, I don't understand how we can tolerate something like that, > that is using on Fedora 23 some packages built on Fedora 22; is there > not any dependency issue?
No. RPM doesn't care about disttag for dependencies unless you actually specify a dependency using it, e.g.: Requires: foo = 1.1-2.fc23 As long as SONAMEs match (or actually, as long as Provides: match), the dependencies are satisfied. There's nothing wrong with having .fc22 packages in F23+ repos. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"