On Ter, 2016-09-06 at 12:43 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > > http://unitedrpms.sourceforge.net/x86_64/repoview/libdvdcss.html > > <http://unitedrpms.sourceforge.net/x86_64/repoview/libdvdcss.html> > > > Is United RPMs here to stay or was that a temporary workaround while > the > RPM Fusion infra was worked on ? > Sérgio, maybe ?
Yes for me is a temporary workaround and later, maybe, a 4th party repo. I found DavidVa on internet, I like his work in postinstallerf ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/postinstaller/ ), and he have updates for many packages not just in RPMFusion , also for Fedora proper. I'm trying to convince him to report things on the source, instead do duplicated packages , but he and Paul don't like follow the rules , they like bundle sources, do big hacks etc etc, which I can't or is not allowed on RPMFusion. So now I'm just watching ... To exemplify avidemux, I merge our repo (via github) to unitedrpms repo and https://github.com/UnitedRPMs/avidemux/commit/61da31ff518ffbe183638 f308c844af9b62f42dc Unitedrpms don't have any infrastructure, use github, sf.net, gitlab, google+ and just have x86_64 packages ! Unitedrpms have others sources like openh264, vo-aacenc , fdk-aac, we are going only discus libdvdcss ? or we may extend for other patents problems . Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.