2018-01-30 10:11 GMT+01:00 David Demelier <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 09:01 +0100, David Demelier wrote: >> A few questions before I ask for reviewing: >> >> 1. RetroArch uses libretro cores that are dynamically loaded, I've >> actually used the /usr/libexec/libretro directory but I wonder if I >> should use /usr/lib64/libretro (from %{_libdir} RPM macro) instead? > > Okay, I've finally found my answer by looking at the custom libretro's > makefiles. > > https://github.com/libretro/nestopia/blob/master/libretro/Makefile#L39 > > So I'll update my packages to use /usr/lib64 instead. > >> 2. RetroArch has no real “installation procedure” so packagers are >> mostly free for setting directories to use, I've separated into two >> different ones: >> >> - /usr/share/libretro for core information (*_libretro.info) >> - /usr/share/retroarch for the RetroArch application (database, >> assets, cheats, cursors, ...) >> >> Are you okay for this or do you prefer using /usr/share/libretro for >> everything? > > They also seem to use /usr/share/libretro for *everything*, I'll update > all and make the review request! > > https://github.com/libretro/retroarch-assets/blob/master/Makefile#L2
Hi David, I'm not sure about why this topic is forwarded to the RPM Fusion mailing list. But it seems that only one dependency depends on ffmpeg. Is it possible to have something working in fedora without ffmpeg support ? (and eventually have a -freeworld version of the same package only in RPM Fusion) ? Thx for your work on this. -- - Nicolas (kwizart) _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
