On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 5:44 PM Sérgio Basto <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Also I though that we might a good idea also show the tained repo in > table as a new line . > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tained | source | i386 | x86_64 | armhfp | source | i386 | x86_64 | > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The list is currently 'release', 'updates', and 'updates-testing', in both free and nonfree flavors, right? But in addition to 'tainted', we have 'drivers' (free and nonfree), plus 'nvidia-driver' & 'steam' (both nonfree only). (I'm not clear how 'nvidia-driver' is different from 'drivers', since they appear to contain the same packages in nonfree. But that's beside the point.) Should we list all of the available repos? I mean, 'free-tainted' only has ONE package in it (libdvdcss), and 'nonfree-tainted' is four firmware blobs. Some of the other non-listed ones contain more packages than that. Or, maybe what's more relevant is, rpmfusion-free-release-29.noarch.rpm and rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29.noarch.rpm currently contain the /etc/yum.repos.d/ definitions for rpmfusion-*.repo, rpmfusion-*-updates.repo, and rpmfusion-*-updates-testing.repo. If we're going to list any additional repos on the site, should their defintions also be downloadable in the release rpms?
_______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
