On Thursday, 06 October 2022 at 18:25, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 17:16 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > Forwarded as a dedicated topic: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > [ ... ] > > > > On my side I want to rework the ffmpeg package to get back to normal > > (so conflicts with fedora will be restored) and only drop a > > libavcodec > > freeworld replacement in an additional dedicated sub-package (with > > ldconfig override) to complement the fedora counterpart. > > > > It means the best of two worlds: > > - Having our ffmpeg build to be fully autonomous. > > Do not require small pieces of fedora ffmpeg, and don't wait for > > counterpart updates, which have been "dramatic" in the past, > > specially > > with chromium. > > - It will also provide a means to complement the fedora ffmpeg-free > > one from the same package (and to not require a dedicated build, > > maintenance). > > So we only need libavcodec_freeworld to complement ffmpeg-free. > > and what about move minidlna , smplayer etc to Fedora proper ? should > it go ?
I've been using minidlna with libav{codec,format,util}-free for many months with no issues. I'd say it can go to Fedora as it doesn't depend on libavcodec at all, only on libavformat and libavutil. libavcodec-free is only pulled in as a dependency of libavformat. I'd be happy to co-maintain as I use it daily. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org