On Thursday, 06 October 2022 at 18:25, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 17:16 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > Forwarded as a dedicated topic:
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > On my side I want to rework the ffmpeg package to get back to normal
> > (so conflicts with fedora will be restored) and only drop a
> > libavcodec
> > freeworld replacement in an additional dedicated sub-package (with
> > ldconfig override) to complement the fedora counterpart.
> >
> > It means the best of two worlds:
> > - Having our ffmpeg build to be fully autonomous.
> > Do not require small pieces of fedora ffmpeg, and don't wait for
> > counterpart updates, which have been "dramatic" in the past,
> > specially
> > with chromium.
> > - It will also provide a means to complement the fedora ffmpeg-free
> > one from the same package (and to not require a dedicated build,
> > maintenance).
>
> So we only need libavcodec_freeworld to complement ffmpeg-free.
>
> and what about move minidlna , smplayer etc to Fedora proper ? should
> it go ?
I've been using minidlna with libav{codec,format,util}-free for many
months with no issues. I'd say it can go to Fedora as it doesn't depend
on libavcodec at all, only on libavformat and libavutil. libavcodec-free
is only pulled in as a dependency of libavformat.
I'd be happy to co-maintain as I use it daily.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
