On 11/02/2011 11:38 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 11/02/2011 11:15 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm running the rawhide kernel (with debugging) and have been experiencing >>> issues with the nouveau video driver, so I decided I >>> wanted to go back to trying the nVidia driver again. I've done the >>> following to try to get a non-debug kernel set to work with for >>> compiling: >> I couldn't find an answer one way or the other, but does the 285 >> series driver support a 3.2 kernel? >> >> Richard >> > Hmm, there are kmod-nvidia packages for 3.1 kernels so I assume (maybe a > stupid assumption) that it would work for 3.2 kernels. And > I like using the akmod version since I update to the latest rawhide kernel > fairly often and the kmod-nvidia packages are typically > somewhat behind....however, it is unbelievably annoying that the akmods won't > compile when the kernel is setup with all of the > debugging turned on since it really makes it difficult to actually post any > useful kernel information to bugzilla when running a > non-debug version of the kernel. Seems like it would make sense to have an > akmods-debug that *could* compile with the debug kernels > and actually help with the debugging of issues....perhaps it's because it's > "closed source" from nVidia that we can't get a > debuggable nVidia akmods package. > > Kevin I also find it interesting that the akmods from rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide is still for f16...isn't f16 in beta now, so not considered rawhide (especially since most, if not all, of the packages in fedora-rawhide are now marked f17)?
Kevin
