Am 27.03.2013 22:23, schrieb Nicolas Chauvet: > yes you need them to build a working ffmpeg > but the rpmfusion build of ffmpeg is crap > > You are obviously miss-leading others readers
no - i show a way to get a RELIEBALE ffmpeg-binary to produce H264/AAC files useable for HTML5 wich is not possible with any rpmfusion ffmpeg-build since many years > RPM Fusion ffmpeg maintainer dropped support for faac because faac was > discovered to > be nonfree software. We (RPM Fusion, or even any sane Free Software Citizen), > should > avoid redistributing GPL software linked with this. PERIOD. it does not interest me why and what ffmpeg worked to produce H264/AAC untila RANDOM update years ago there is rpmfusion-nonfree, but hey to use it for ffmpeg would have lead to re-strcuture what is in rpmfusion-free and what is in rpmfusion-nonfree which nobody cares > There is nothing to worry about faac, that was not a very good AAC encoder I > was said but it works, your builds do not > Now what could be fixed instead is to use the fdk-aac library instead: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencore-amr/files/fdk-aac/ > There are many complain about aac encoding, one should complaint about this > library not packaged into RPM Fusion > (and should stop talking but to package it). > and again... PERIOD. it is nice what you COULD but it does not interest me since the day whoever crippeled the ffmpeg-package and i stared to build my own packages a day later well until a few months they was not static-build but since i switched to static builds i am completly independent from rpmfusion and if this night ffmpeg-1.3 is released you can be pretty sure that i have tomowwor 1:00 AM a wokring package for F17/F18 running trough any autotests and ready to deploy even for production servers
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
