Am 27.03.2013 23:11, schrieb Alice Wonder: > On 3/27/2013 2:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 27.03.2013 22:23, schrieb Nicolas Chauvet: >>> yes you need them to build a working ffmpeg >>> but the rpmfusion build of ffmpeg is crap >>> >>> You are obviously miss-leading others readers >> >> no - i show a way to get a RELIEBALE ffmpeg-binary to produce >> H264/AAC files useable for HTML5 wich is not possible with any >> rpmfusion ffmpeg-build since many years > > Looking at the rpmfusion spec file, it seems I just need to define one macro > and rebuild. That's not really that > big of a deal
oh yeah, and each time rpmfusion raises the Release-var you have to take care that you rebuild again or break your applications - been there, done that you missed the word RELIEBALE [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ ls /usr/local/bin/ffmpeg -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 12M 2013-03-22 21:26 /usr/local/bin/ffmpeg this build is COMPLETLY independent of any ffmpeg-libs and x264-libs which other packages are using and provides only a ffmpeg-cli binary only linking dynamic to other libs than x264 which raises permanently the so-name as ffmpeg does also
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
