Good.

Either solution sounds reasonable to me.

Laurent

2008/11/12 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:09 PM, laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> That's not (yet) stated in the doc, but the code
>> for rpy2.riniterface.__init__ tells it:
>>
>> 1- look for R_HOME
>> 2- if not R_HOME, try to get R_HOME from an executable R in
>> the $PATH/%Path%
>> 3- if still nothing and win32, try to get R from the registry
>>
>> L.
>
> That's a slightly different order from rpy1 (which was R_HOME,
> registry, PATH). Its important that R_HOME is first so the user can
> easily over-ride the automatic detection (e.g. if they have more than
> one version of R installed).
>
> If I can find the time this week I'll try and test this out on my
> Windows machine - but no promises.  From memory the registry gives the
> base folder, and you have to add the "bin" directory to get the full
> path for the DLL.
>
> Peter
>
> P.S. I would change this error message from
> rpy2/rinterface/__init__.py (lines 24 to 26)
>
> raise RuntimeError("R_HOME define, and no R command in the PATH.")
>
> to:
> raise RuntimeError("R_HOME undefined, and no R command on the PATH.")
>
> or more explicitly:
> raise RuntimeError("Could not locate R.  The R_HOME environment
> variable is undefined, and there is R command on the PATH.")
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
rpy-list mailing list
rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list

Reply via email to