Hi Kevin, On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 08:44:40PM -0600, kevin brintnall wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:42:13PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote: > > (Disclaimer: I did not really follow that, so I might repeat stuff or > > just talk plain bullshit - if so, please tell me ;-)) > > Check my previous email on the thread and let me know if you still have > questions about the BATCH protocol. The current implementation is > documented in rrdcached.pod. [...]
Well, I don't really have any questions about the current implemen- tation. I was just going to bring up a few ideas about how to get a correct status even when using the BATCH mode but I did not know what has been discussed on that topic so far. So, did you look at my suggestions? What do you think about that? I know that this would require a change of the protocol but the current imple- mentation has not yet been released, so it's still time to change it if required / wanted. Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list rrd-developers@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
