On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:43:58PM -0400, Jean-Francois Patenaude wrote: > Of course, as you mentionned earlier, the best way to achieve the MIN/MAX > I was looking for is to have a finer grain step (i.e. 1 second) But > in this case, I would get much larger RRD files which I really don't want.
Why? Having a step size of 60 and storing one PDP per CDP uses the same amount of bytes compared to step size 1 and 60 PDPs per CDP. I don't understand what you mean, or you don't understand what I mean... Alex -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
