Oh 1 more question, by using "RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:10000" with a step = 1, this is as good as storing raw data. So why would anyone want to specify another RRA like "RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:288:797" or "RRA:MAX:0.5:288:797"?
Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hwee Khoon, Neo Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 3:15 PM To: Rrd-Users Subject: [rrd-users] Question on RRA and number of rows Hi RRD users, will there be any performance impact if the number of specified "rows" is set very high? e.g. rrdtool create default.rrd --step 300 DS:ioct:GAUGE:600:0:U DS:ooct:GAUGE:600:0:U RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:10000 <-this value I would like to have a history of at least 2 months and am contemplating using: RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:288:797 is the downside of using this only affects the accuracy of the result? Thanks! Rgds, HK -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
