Hi Bill,

Sorry for the delay.  The Real World intervened.  ;-)

Big important web site = at least one more route
in the table.
Who decides what's big and important?
Historically, the people willing to pay the most money do. Like CNN.


Well, we've run that experiment. We've been unable to create a market for routing table slots. Handing them out any other way would seem to get us right back into the problem that we're trying to solve.


Then anycast is by definition unicast since you only pick one
direction. Hence some unicast is anycast. Hence failing to support
anycast in the architecture is a failure to completely support
unicast. ;-)


We don't support any unaggregated (or insufficiently aggregated) unicast. What else is new? ;-)

Tony


_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to