On Thursday 3 September 2009 10:51:32 [email protected] wrote: > In einer eMail vom 02.09.2009 20:56:08 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt > [email protected]: > > > All nodes are potentially mobile. > > In order to be findable on the general network, mobile nodes need care of > > their location. For that they have to be recognized by identity, as all > > nodes should. > > whatever identity means with respect to whichever layer; and because the IP > address fails to be the right identity information some location > information is needed (instead or at least in addition).
Heiner, My vision is that identity of nodes is to be based on relations with other nodes. Especially, mutual knowledge of location within the general network. Maintaining this knowledge continuously and all over the network shall make node mobility natural and inconspicuous. I seek understanding and opinions on this vision, and I disfavor non-network based identity. Toni > LISP is a jackup solution. Its means are typical: mapping and tunnel > building (wrapping, encapsulating). > It tries to adjust the future to the past. Somehow it reminds me of MADCAP. > > Heiner > > On Wednesday 2 September 2009 20:47:42 Toni Stoev wrote: > > Mobile node is a dynamically multihomed node. > > > > Toni > > > > > > On Wednesday 2 September 2009 16:56:56 [email protected] wrote: > > > While mobility aspects pop up in the LISP-discussion, I like to refer > to > > > some mobility aspect here on the rrg-list. > > > The issue "mobile node" needs adequate consideration. A future proven > > > solution shouldn't have to worry even if ALL nodes were mobile. > > > Currently mobility is defined as "moving relatively to the non-mobile > > > nodes".However there exists one static non-mobile abstract network > which is the > > > grid of longitudes and latitudes. > > > By coming up with a relativity towards this stable and never changing > grid > > > any node/router can be whatsoever: fix (for a while) or mobile (all > the > > > time). > > > > > > And IP-addresses can be whatsoever too: PA or PI. > > > While giving up the current meaning for forwarding IP addresses they > might > > > take on other meanings: > > > > > > I read some article static that Cisco officials consider smartgrid > > > powerline networks to become a second huge topic.Well readdressing > might envision > > > AFI's of different technologies !? > > > > > > Heiner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > > > > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
