Noel Chiappa wrote:
> I am writing a critique - not an official RRG assessment of LISP.But there will only be one critique in the document, therefore your text comes awfully close to an "official RRG assessment of LISP".
The document that we are compiling is a multi-contribution survey, and is NOT the consensus of the RG. There is nothing "official" about the opinions represented in the document.
This issue was raised privately by Joel (not Noel ;-) and he has contributed some text to the introduction to clarify this.
Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
