Hi Noel, On 1/21/10 5:11 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > I had thought it not desirable for people involved in proposals to write > critiques of proposals they were involved with, because I thought 'external' > views would be better. >
As long as the process is clearly stated in the compendium, I think it is nearly unavoidable to have at least some experts do some of the critiquing. My favorite example of this was what happened on the selection of AES. Many of the proponents of various proposals critiqued the others. NIST had a joyous time reading through all of those. But who better to do those critiques? Uninvolved fence sitters with no skin in the game? And so to your point - I think ALL critiques should be included. I see no reason why Tony or Lixia should have to choose. Eliot _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
