Noel Chiappa wrote:
Yes, but people never read the fine print...
Well, that's NOT our problem. If folks choose to avoid the words as presented, or choose to misinterpret because they read every other word, then that is THEIR incompetence. We do not dumb things down to match.
I had thought it not desirable for people involved in proposals to write critiques of proposals they were involved with, because I thought 'external' views would be better.
Agreed and strongly preferred.
However, since the only existing LISP critique has, in my view, major problems (too much focus on minor, passing problems, and not enough attention to unavoidable architectural limitations), I will prepare an alternative, and you and Lixia can pick whichever seems best.
Hurry please. I want to get this draft out quickly. Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
