On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:03 AM, <heinerhum...@aol.com> wrote: > loop: from PG1 to PG2 back to PG1. Today I see opposition against TARA > because the network inside a geopatch might partition. Yes, this may happen. > But dealing with partitions starts with getting from one partition to the > other. And I can only offer a loop: out to some neighbor geopatch, from > there back to the other partition of the own geopatch.
if all you know is PG1, no subnets/sublocators/identifiers, how does pg2 know not to send traffic back the same link it came from? (note this all seems pretty far out of rrg though) _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
