> From: Tony Li <tony...@tony.li>
> Of course, if we were to instantly and miraculously get consensus on
> definitions, I'd be happy to incorporate them.
Why don't you see if anyone has a problem with them, and if not, they're good
to go. (I tried to make them just wishy-washy enough that basically everyone
_would_ be OK with them...)
>> Provider Independent: Addresses which 'belong to' a site
> The ARIN lawyers will freak over 'belong to'.
Well, there was a reason it was in quote marks, as a euphemism... :-)
OK, if colloquialisms aren't acceptable, how about "Addresses which are
assigned to a site on a semi-permanent basis", or something like that?
Noel
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
