On May 31, 2010, at 12:42 AM, Toni Stoev wrote: > On Monday 31 May 2010 at 08:07:45 Tony Li sent: >> >> On 5/23/10 3:49 PM, "Toni Stoev" <i...@tonistoev.info> wrote: >> >>> Dae Young, fellow researchers, >>> >>> Let me formulate two basic statements out of the recent discussion: >>> >>> 1. "Node" is the proper granularity unit for an intra-domain routing point. >>> >>> Presuming that inter-domain routing is based on routing domains as >>> inter-domain routing points: >>> >>> 2. Inter-domain routing shall be based on intra-domain routing as a service. >>> >>> This allows for inter-domainly transparent intra-domain routing as well as >>> for >>> intra-domain traffic engineering. >>> >>> Do you agree with the statements? >>> >>> http://www.doodle.com/8g5857qvudsnwquf >> >> >> This poll has now run a week. There are four respondents. Both statements >> got 2 agreements, so this does not appear to be rough consensus. > > Smooth parity withstands. > I am deducing to ask research folks whether routing point granualrity matters > to routing scalability.
although I do not quite understand the definition of "routing point": maybe you could get some answers by examining what factors affect routing scalability? Lixia _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
