(I'm perfectly OK with ILNP. I was just not comfortable with terminologies. So much for that.)
As I confessed, I'm not a routing expert. So, please, folks, have some patience with my asking from A and B. As to the problem of routing scalability. My curiosities are: 1. Why, in the first place, did people allow sites to inject PI addresses in DFZ? Why not simply reject PI in DFZ, limiting their use strictly inside a site? 2. As to sites that migrated across ISPs, why not simply throw away old PA addresses injected into a new ISP that is not responsible for service to such foreign addresses? If the two operational rules had been kept strictly, then there would not have been the problem of DFZ routing table explosion. There must be some other compelling reasons why this could not have been done. What are they? And additionally, 3. Is there any slightest chance that the authority (ICANN? IETF?) resume to mandate such strict rules as above to bring back the situation where it ought to have been? -- DY _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
