I guess there are some potential advantages in deploying multipath inter-domain routing. For instance, currently each border router forwards the traffic for a prefix through the same next AS. Balancing through two different next ASes it is not possible without re- advertising and sending the control plane to reconverge. Using multipath the balancing could be done even in a fine granularity (e.g. per packet) so that,

- Different treatment (e.g. regarding QoS) could be provided per packet/flow, relaying traffic to a better provider (likely to have a higher pricing) and charging more money to the customers.
        - The latter may enable pricing and services competition.
- Egress traffic engineering could be decoupled from the routing advertisement, forwarding to an upstream provider or another should be transparent to downstream customer ASes if they all the paths are advertised beforehand.
        - Congestion control may be more flexible for ISPs.

Thinking of future architectures, the case of multipath-aware transport protocols would let some or full control of the path selection to final hosts. It is not likely that ISPs go for this, but theoretically failure detection, failure recovery and better congestion control should be possible in this scenario, since end- hosts can measure end-to-end performance easily.


Jose M. Camacho,   jcama...@it.uc3m.es, www.uc3m.es
+34916248795



El 11/05/2011, a las 0:36, Sampo Syreeni escribió:

On 2011-05-10, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

What about doing some work in multi-path routing in the inter- domain? i.e. enabling a router to use multiple paths with potential different characteristics to forward packets across domains. Would people find this topic interesting?

I'd guess they would, since the idea is so old and also underexploited. But does it bring in real extra value? I.e. does anybody know whether multipath routing could significantly increase the total utilization of the routing fabric, either now or under some theoretically founded future situation?

If nobody knows, a preliminary study could be IRTF material.
--
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - de...@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-50-5756111, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to