Well, here in the lab we like to play with routes and names, so I'm interested 
:-)

Javier


El 15-11-2013, a las 12:24, Russ White <ru...@riw.us> escribió:

> 
> Some things of interest might be the intersection of naming and routing, or 
> the problems around centralizing control planes (though this might be more 
> aligned with sdnrg). Maybe something around network programmability?
> 
> :-)
> 
> Russ
> 
> <><
> ru...@riw.us
> Ericsson
> 
>> On Nov 15, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> We seem to have several volunteers who would be interested in helping.  
>> That's great.  More are, of course welcome.
>> 
>> Lars has suggested that we form a program committee to organize this, and I 
>> concur.   
>> 
>> So, for folks that are interested: What papers would we like to see here?  
>> What topics should we invite?  Who are researchers in the area who are doing 
>> interesting things?  Who has the contacts to approach them?
>> 
>> And should we take this discussion off-list so as to not annoy everyone?
>> 
>> Tony
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 14, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am also interested and would travel if feasible.
>>> 
>>> Alia
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Scott Brim <scott.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'd be very interested in participating (assuming I can afford the travel) 
>>> so you have at least one participant. Let me know if you want my help 
>>> organizing after you see all your volunteers.
>>> 
>>> Scott
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Eggert, Lars <l...@netapp.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> the RRG has been awfully quiet for a while now. I'd like to see if we can 
>>> reboot the group and bring in some new work. There is clearly interesting 
>>> work happening in the routing research space; we handed out several ANRP 
>>> prizes to routing papers over the last few years. How can we bring some of 
>>> that research into the RRG?
>>> 
>>> To that end, I'd like to ask if people would be interested in organizing a 
>>> session - either at the next IETF meeting or maybe co-located with a 
>>> conference - where folks can bring some ongoing academic work, in order to 
>>> see if there's enough momentum to carry the group forward.
>>> 
>>> If that sounds interesting, great. I hope if sounds interesting enough to 
>>> some of you to volunteer to put in the cycles and organize said meeting. If 
>>> that doesn't sounds interesting, I'm all ears on how else we can restart 
>>> activities in the RRG. Or maybe it's time to close?
>>> 
>>> Lars
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rrg mailing list
>>> rrg@irtf.org
>>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rrg mailing list
>>> rrg@irtf.org
>>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rrg mailing list
>>> rrg@irtf.org
>>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rrg mailing list
>> rrg@irtf.org
>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to