The user should be made aware that his equipment is about to send out data. I have no problems if this were done in either case (national or international destination).
Look, a government is suit for not protecting its people for being spied out. This means there is a strong interest for such protection but this also means, a state has to be empowered to effectively prevent what it is accused for. This is not balkanization. People have created states/nations themselves for good reason. The existing permanent data fraud must not last forever. Or do you think this is a special form of "freedom/liberty" ? Heiner -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Scott Weeks <sur...@mauigateway.com> An: heinerhummel <heinerhum...@aol.com> Verschickt: Mi, 5 Feb 2014 2:52 am Betreff: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Wouldn't this lead to balkinization of the internet? scott --- heinerhum...@aol.com wrote: From: heinerhum...@aol.com With the current routing architecture and its complete absence of any WHERE-awareness there is no way to give back any country its sovereignty. With TARA that wouldn't be a problem: Each country would recognize "its" part of the internet (intra- and inter-domain portions alike) and could take action that within its borders packets were encrypted according to its own keys. Packets which are being sent to outside of the country would be recognized as such ones and the user might be questioned to confirm whether forwarding should be done or not - just like he is reminded to add a subject line if missing.
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
