> Moreover, the BOF proposal is outside of the scope of the RRG and is, > frankly, off topic for the mailing list. I do realize that there is some > commonality of interest in the audience, but holding the BOF is *not* > forwarding our work within the RRG, and discussing holding the BOF is simply > a level of indirection on a tangential subject.
Understood. Just trying to keep things as open and
transparent as the I{E,R}TF processes will allow.
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
