In einer eMail vom 20.03.2008 17:59:34 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would think that we would want to support it as the same level of scalability as coarser aggregates. However, we have not yet discussed what level of scalability is a necessity. Yet another item on the discussion list... Tony quote from draft-carpenter-idloc-map-cons-01.txt: 4.6. Scale We want no arbitrary scaling limits. However, proposed scaling targets are 10 to 100 billion Stacks (which scales the Identifier Namespace), and 10 million sites. Although the latter does not directly scale the Internet's Locator Namespace, it indicates the worst-case granularity of the routing table for that Locator Namespace. If we don't do better than random allocation of address blocks to sites, we will end up with 10 million routing table entries. Heiner
