David Chelimsky wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All I'm doing is passing the instance variables @label and @artist in
>> the controller to the view using this code:
>>
>> @label = current_user.labels.find(params[:label_id])
>> @artist = params[:id].nil? ? Artist.new : @label.artists.find(params[:id])
>>
>> By sending these two instance variables to the view, I don't need to
>> specify these arguments and the view just works. Can you get it to
>> work when you specify these instance variables in your controller?
> 
> No. That's what I'm saying. I get the same ambigous URL error you
> cited in the first email in this thread, but in the browser. Using
> edge rails, edge rspec.

Dumb question, but do you have the resource mapped in your routes.rb 
file?  Something like

map.resources :artists

Jay

> 
>> -L
>>
>> On 8/8/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I just passed label_artist_path(@label.id, @artist.id) into the view
>>>> and it worked.. but I really don't want to have to pass those
>>>> parameters in all my views. It looks ugly. Does anyone know a way
>>>> around this without stubbing? It seems useless to test this view
>>>> without allowing those methods to act out their real behavior.
>>> Can you point me to docs that say you're supposed to be able to just
>>> call label_artist_path without any args? I've not see such docs and I
>>> can't get it to work in any of my views - and I'm talking about just
>>> rendering the views at all, not getting specs to work.
>>>
>>>> -TIA
>>>>
>>>> On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> ActionView::TemplateError in 'Edit Artist Page should render the edit
>>>>> artist form'
>>>>> label_artist_url failed to generate from {:controller=>"artists",
>>>>> :action=>"show"} - you may have ambiguous routes, or you may need to
>>>>> supply additional parameters for this route.  content_url has the
>>>>> following required parameters: ["labels", :label_id, "artists", :id] -
>>>>> are they all satisfied?
>>>>> On line #3 of app/views/artists/edit.rhtml
>>>>>
>>>>>     1: <h1>Editing artist</h1>
>>>>>     2:
>>>>>     3: <% form_tag label_artist_path, :method => :put do %>
>>>>>     4:   <%= render :partial => 'form' %>
>>>>>     5:   <%= submit_tag 'Save' %>
>>>>>     6: <% end %>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My spec looks like:
>>>>>
>>>>> require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../../spec_helper'
>>>>>
>>>>> describe 'Edit Artist Page' do
>>>>>   before do
>>>>>     @label = mock_model(Label)
>>>>>     @artist = mock_model(Artist)
>>>>>
>>>>>     assigns[:label] = @label
>>>>>     assigns[:artist] = @artist
>>>>>   end
>>>>>
>>>>>   def render_edit
>>>>>     render :template => 'artists/edit'
>>>>>   end
>>>>>
>>>>>   it "should render the edit artist form" do
>>>>>     render_edit
>>>>>   end
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/8/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/8/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> I am using helper the RESTfully generated helper methods in my views.
>>>>>>> My routes are nested so the helpers appear to need arguments passed to
>>>>>>> them, but it works without arguments. Say for example I have pages and
>>>>>>> comments. If I do page_comments_path without parameters, it works.
>>>>>>> However, when I run the rspec test, it fails and tells me i'm missing
>>>>>>> parameters. I tried to pass params[:page_id], but it still says it
>>>>>>> needs parameters. I did fill in the parameters like it asked and the
>>>>>>> test passed, but I think my views look cleaner without the arguments
>>>>>>> being passed everywhere. Do I have to stub these methods to get my
>>>>>>> views to pass, or is there some other way?
>>>>>> It would be much easier to answer your question if you posted the
>>>>>> actual spec and code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TIA,
>>>>>>> Lance
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>>>>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>>>>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>>>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>>>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to